top of page

Fertilizer Inefficiency & Nutrient Loss

Ontario farmers spend $150–250/acre on fertilizer annually — but soil physical problems mean 20–40% of that investment may never reach the crop.

The Fertilizer Efficiency Crisis

Nitrogen fertilizer is typically the single largest variable input cost on Ontario grain farms. At current prices, applying 160–180 lbs N/ac of UAN or anhydrous ammonia costs $80–120/ac — a substantial investment that farmers expect to generate a proportional yield response. Yet on many Ontario fields, the return on nitrogen investment is declining.

Key Takeaway: The problem is not the fertilizer product or the application rate — it is what happens to nitrogen after it enters the soil. On soils with poor physical condition — compactedpoorly drained, or structurally degraded — nitrogen is lost through multiple pathways before crops can use it.

Nitrogen Loss Pathways on Ontario Farms

Denitrification

The single largest nitrogen loss pathway on Ontario's poorly drained clay soils. When soil pores fill with water, denitrifying bacteria consume nitrate as an alternative electron acceptor. Losses range from 15–50% of applied nitrogen. Compaction dramatically worsens denitrification by creating perched water tables above compacted layers.

Leaching

Nitrate is highly mobile in soil water and moves downward with percolating water. On well-drained sandy soils, leaching can remove 20–40% of applied nitrogen below the root zone within weeks. Fall-applied nitrogen on sandy soils is particularly vulnerable.

Volatilization

When urea-based fertilizers are surface-applied without incorporation, volatilization losses can reach 15–25% within 7–10 days, particularly on high-pH soils common in Essex and Kent counties.

Surface Runoff

Nitrogen applied to the soil surface can be lost in surface runoff during heavy rainfall events. On sloped fields with poor infiltration, runoff carries dissolved nitrogen and nitrogen-bearing sediment off the field.

Phosphorus Challenges on Ontario Farms

While nitrogen loss is the primary fertilizer efficiency concern, phosphorus management also affects field-level economics. Ontario soils have accumulated significant soil test phosphorus from decades of fertilizer and manure application.

YIELD-LIMITING

Below 12 ppm (Olsen P)

Phosphorus fertilizer will produce a significant yield response.

MAINTENANCE RANGE

12–30 ppm (Olsen P)

Apply phosphorus to replace crop removal.

ELEVATED

30–60 ppm (Olsen P)

Reduce or eliminate phosphorus applications.

EXCESSIVE

Above 60 ppm (Olsen P)

High environmental risk. No phosphorus should be applied.

Recent research highlights the importance of phosphorus use efficiency — banding fertilizer near the seed row can improve fertilizer P recovery by 30–50% compared to broadcast application. The connection between erosion and phosphorus loss is also critical — eroded soil carries phosphorus off the field.

Potassium and Micronutrient Considerations

Potassium (K) is the third macronutrient, and Ontario soils vary widely in K availability depending on clay content and mineralogy. Micronutrient deficiencies — particularly zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and boron (B) — are emerging as yield-limiting factors on some Ontario soils, especially where high soil pH reduces micronutrient availability.

The Soil Physical–Nutrient Connection

Screenshot 2026-04-08 150306.jpg

Why This Matters for Yield

On a compactedpoorly drained field:

  • Applied nitrogen is lost to denitrification because compaction prevents drainage

  • Roots cannot access nutrients below the compacted layer

  • Reduced biological activity slows organic matter mineralization

  • Poor structure reduces water infiltration, increasing runoff losses

Key Takeaway: Increasing fertilizer rates on these fields does not solve the problem — it simply increases the proportion of applied nutrients that are lost. The FHCU diagnosis shifts the focus from "apply more" to "fix the soil conditions that prevent efficient uptake" — a fundamentally more profitable approach.

Manure as a Nutrient Source

Ontario's livestock sector produces significant quantities of manure that, when properly managed, represents a valuable nutrient resource. The OMAFRA Manure Management BMP outlines nutrient values for common Ontario manure types: liquid dairy (25–35 kg N/1000 L), solid beef (5–7 kg N/tonne), and liquid swine (40–55 kg N/1000 L).

However, manure nutrient value is often underestimated, leading to over-application and nutrient accumulation — particularly phosphorus. Timing of manure application is critical: fall application on tile-drained fields risks significant nitrogen loss through both denitrification and leaching over winter.

Signs of Degraded Soil Structure

Screenshot 2026-04-14 133809.jpg

Common Problems We See

  • Underperforming fields with compaction or drainage problems losing 30–40% of applied N

  • Fields with excessive soil test P (>40 ppm) still receiving P fertilizer — an unnecessary $15–25/ac cost

  • Mismatched N application timing relative to crop demand and soil moisture

  • Unrecognized manure nutrient credits leading to excess total nutrient application

By addressing the physical soil conditions that drive nutrient loss, the FHCU helps farmers achieve the same or better yields with lower fertilizer costs — improving both profitability and environmental performance. Book your free checkup to find out if fertilizer inefficiency is costing you money.

Ready to Find Out What's Limiting Your Yields?

Book your FREE Farmland Health Check-Up today. Available to all Ontario farmers — no cost, no eligibility screening.

bottom of page